Do (micro) black holes extract energy from the vacuum?

Is there a future possibility to extract energy from the vacuum?
Is harnessing ball lightning perhaps the solution for our energy problem on Earth.
One of the most involved persons on this issue is Jack Sarfatti.
His latest paper is the next one:
The emergence of gravity etc. etc. Authors: Jack Sarfatti, Creon Levit (Submitted on 31 Jan 2009) http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0032
Abstract: We present a model for the origin of gravity, dark energy and dark matter: Dark energy and dark matter are residual pre-inflation false vacuum random zero point energy (w=-1) of large-scale negative, and short-scale positive pressure, respectively, corresponding to the "zero point" (incoherent) component of a superfluid (supersolid) ground state. Gravity, in contrast, arises from the 2nd order topological defects in the post-inflation virtual "condensate" (coherent) component.
For my personal contribution for a Higgs vacuum driven electron pump, see my book and pages 92-96:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1409210316/ref=sib_dp_ptu#reader-link
type: 92 in the search engine box and click on "page 92" to find more.

Micro Black Holes are everywhere, inside Sunspots, Comets, Ball Lightning and even Herbig Haro objects

Based on observation of the ball lightning photo of mr. van Overhagen, the Langmuir video of fireball producing Sprites and the Sungrazer Comets, we may conclude that there are at least three ways of micro black hole production possible, leading to the existence of ball lightning, small Comets and large Comets.
1: Three-wave interference of ordinary lightning into ball lightning (see Overhagen photo)
2. Three wave interference of Sprite lightning into bigger ball lightning or small Comets ( see the Langmuir video)
3. Three wave interference of Stellar Electro magnetic eruptions into small and large Comets. The evidence of EM and x-rays is clearly found in this video:

http://www.livescience.com/common/media/video/player.php?videoRef=250407Sun_outburst

The fact that we observe very few ball lightning around strong lightning activity, is reason to assume that not only magnetic or electric energy but also x-ray interference energy is at stake.

(Message to the cyclesi group)

Thank you Bill for this new elongated LANMUIR LAB. video, because it tells me a crucial fact more than the shorter Langmuir video of the Sprite I had before.
It tells me that at the end of the down falling Sprite fireballs they GO UPWARDS!!!! Which supports my small Comet proposal:

See the new longer video:

http://www.livescience.com/common/media/video/player.php?videoRef=080607sprites

HYPERION the spongy but icy comet remains, abandoned by its nuclear micro black hole, has become a moon of Saturn.

see also:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/ball-lightning-or-small-comet-pulsar.html

MAGNETIC-X-RAY INTERFERENCE AS THE ORIGIN OF ALL BALL LIGHTNING AND COMETS

(DOUBLE CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT)

The idea of the origin of natural and artificial ball lightning or small Comets, is that ONLY the postulated three-wave interference mechanism including at least one x-gamma ray component is needed to form a real particle KNOT inside the oscillating new Higgs vacuum lattice.
This KNOT ( or micro black hole) seems to be able to produce a macro CASIMER effect and violate the second law of thermodynamics by the Fermion repelling horizon.
I have no knowledge of measured x-gamma-ray production around artificial or natural ball lightning.
I only have knowledge of the fact that Comets sometimes emit x-rays and even have signs of anti matter annihilation.
These effects are in line with my new (micro) black hole theory.
The production of x-rays inside lightning strokes is well known and first observed by J.R.Dwyer, see:
http://my.fit.edu/~jdwyer/papers.htm
See also: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
For x-ray production related to discharges, see x rays from 80 cm long sparks in air:
http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/PDF/AGU/Rahman_et_al_2008.pdf
Multiple X-ray bursts from long discharges in air, C.V. Nguyen, A.P.J. van Deursen, U. Ebert, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 234012 (2008) [7 pages, 7 figures], paper

SPRITES AND ELVES AS THE ORIGIN OF SMALL COMETS AND LARGE BALL LIGHTNINGS

Fireball photo by Jon Burnett, Sept 2003, the second photo was taken about 4 minutes later. You may observe that the speed of the fireball was not very high as meteors mostly used to be.
Secondly the brightness of the fireball is very much decreased in the second photo. This is an idication that the sunset reflection of the vapour trail, is responsible for most of the brightness and a support for the "Small Comet" hypothesis.

Fireball photo by Werner Burger in Montafon mountains Austria.
Werner reported that there was some dripping rain and far rumbling thunder.What we are able to observe on this photo, is that this fireball has a TAIL which seem to be produce a trail of (water) vapour.At the same time it looks as if some raindrops are accelerated with a "curve" into the direction of the falling fireball, which could be a sign of mass Dynamic attraction by the fireball.Some other "raindrops" seem to be linear accelerated more or less in line and keep up with the fireballs tail.These features seem to me a clear example of the violation of the second law of thermodynamics and a great support of my model for a NEW black hole theory.http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/02/higgs-vacuum-energy-lensing-effect-and.html

Below you find a LANGMUIR LABORATORY video of a Sprite in very slow motion, taken with 10.000 frames per second.
What you see is the production of multiple ball lighnings falling down.
My suggestion is, that all balls create a so called "pushing gas tail" to get an horizontal motion.
Only the largest falling balls are able to create a large enough pushing gas-tail to become a small COMET which is able to climb at higher altitudes, as the NASA videos show us.
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/02/sprites-and-elves-origin-of-small.html



For an even more detailed Langmuir video, with clear cut fireball production see;

For a double tailed small Comet, reflecting in the evening sun see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff1xZNddQIE&NR=1

Production of Fireballs as potential micro Comets going DOWN AND UPWARDS
inside Sprites: a LANGMUIR SLOW MOTION video,
10.000 frames per second.
We count that these fireballs run for about 10 kms in 1 second.
If this video is running on 25 frames/sec, the speed of these balls is about 4000 km/sec

EXAMPLES OF BALL LIGHTNING AND SMALL COMETS ON EARTH.

This is a compilation of free moving fireballs found on youtube.


For comparizon reasons, this is a slow motion video of ordinary cloud to ground lightning.
The lightballs at the beginning of the stepped leaders are NOT ball lightnings!

EXAMPLES OF LARGE BLs or SMALL COMETS IN OUTER SPACE

This small comet of a NASA ISS video, suddenly changes direction probably by a flip of the pushing tail.

This NASA ISS video show us the production of two Earth bound small Comets.

Small Asteroids are called bolides.
Small Fireballs at high altitude are called Near Earth Objects (NEOs)

Evidence for external Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)

Andromeda (M31) image without visible external black hole (x-ray hotspot) structure.

It is well established that X-ray production should be present around black-hole sources due to interaction with local gas.
As a consequence we observe black hole locations around gaseous galaxies in space by x-ray images taken by the CHANDRA satellite.

Andromeda, (M31) and the Sombrero galaxy seem to be excellent examples. .
However in both cases the brightest x-ray sources are located far outside these galaxies.
This seems to be a clear support for a NEW black hole theory.

M31, with multiple x-ray hotspots (GABHs) around the galaxy.

Chandra x-ray image of Andromeda (above) with multiple x-ray hotspots (Galaxy Anchor black holes) around the Galaxy.

Most of the M31 x-ray sources are identified as Globular Clusters (GCs), obviously equipped with at least one central black hole.
As a matter of fact astronomers concluded that:
The brightest M31 x-ray (GC) sources tend to reside at large galactic distances outside the central bulge. See:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AAS...204.4917T
The X-ray dots are DECREASING IN DIAMETER towards THE CENTER OF THE GALAXY! This is a firm support for a NEW black hole theory introducing Fermion repelling horizons and massless Black holes.!
Evidence for external Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)

see also:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/04/mainstream-physics-is-not-able-to.html

Galaxy Form and Formation by dual NEW black holes.

THE MILKY WAY CENTRE: NO GIANT BLACK HOLE ?!! inside young galaxies ONLY SMALL ONES!

see also http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

If we explore this interesting image (see above) and the correlated text, we seem to miss any trail of a central giant black hole lurking.

HOW CAN?

WE CAN, IF WE CHANGE OUR STANDARD MODEL and ideas A LITTLE BIT.

SEE:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/04/mainstream-physics-is-not-able-to.html

The center of our Galaxy and the giant black hole, is by the mainstream logically supposed to be located at the hart of Sagittarius A open star cluster see the star accelerations around the Sag A, the red cross :
http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/milkyway_bh/index.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081211.html
So if a giant black hole is located inside Sag A, it would be expected that around Sag A the gaseous structure of space around Sag A is strongly influenced by that Giant and e.g. lots of swirling gas trails are visible which is not .

The only visible trails are two elliptic grey filaments which could be the tell tails of two medium sized black holes, just as is suggested to be the origin of the other elliptic filaments visible around the two other open star clusters. (called Quintuplet and Arches cluster)

If black holes differ a little from the mainstream assumption, then there is a firm reason to suggest that the star accelerations also are possible in the middle TWO or even more DUAL medium sized black holes.
See also: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/04/mainstream-physics-is-not-able-to.html

NO GIANT black hole inside the Galaxy center?
The mainstream ideas about a Giant Milky way- central black hole are lately firmly supported by clear stellar acceleration profiles around the Sagittarius A cluster, see:
http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/milkyway_bh/index.html

However according to new combined Hubble images of the Sgt..A area there is no sign of any gaseous filamentary Vortex or elliptic structure.
Instead we see more than one clear elliptic filaments around the three stellar clusters called: Sagittarius A, Quintuplet and Arches cluster.
This seems to be a tell tale for more than one (at least three) barycentres as the origin of these open star clusters.
My conclusion based on a new interpretation of black hole splitting and paring
The center of the Milky way is supposed to be equipped with several medium sized DUAL black holes (BHs) forming circular visible gas filaments (elliptic trails) and in the barycenter in the middle between dual black holes: open star clusters like Sgt A, the Quintuplet and Arches cluster. Conclusion: there is NO Giant Black hole in the center of our galaxy.
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/01/milky-way-centre-no-giant-black-hole.html

The text below related to this image was made by: Astronomic picture of the day. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090107.html



The Galactic Core in Infrared Credit: Hubble: NASA, ESA, & D. Q. Wang (U. Mass, Amherst); Spitzer: NASA, JPL, & S. Stolovy (SSC/Caltech)
Explanation: What's happening at the center of our Milky Way Galaxy? To help find out, the orbiting Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes have combined their efforts to survey the region in unprecedented detail in infrared light. Infrared light is particularly useful for probing the Milky Way's center because visible light is more greatly obscured by dust. The above image encompasses over 2,000 images from the Hubble Space Telescope's NICMOS taken last year. The image spans 300 by 115 light years with such high resolution that structures only 20 times the size of our own Solar System are discernable. Clouds of glowing gas and dark dust as well as three large star clusters are visible. Magnetic fields may be channeling plasma along the upper left near the Arches Cluster, while energetic stellar winds are carving pillars near the Quintuplet Cluster on the lower left. The massive Central Cluster of stars surrounding Sagittarius A* is visible on the lower right. Why several central, bright, massive stars appear to be unassociated with these star clusters is not yet understood.
This description "NOT YET UNDERSTOOD" is in sharp contrast with former releases of the ESA study of 16 years on the center of the Galaxy, presented earlier, talking about the proof of the giant lurking black hole inside the Sagitarius complex see:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081211.html

THE CARINA NEBULA the origin for pillars of creation

Examples of SPLITTING AND PAIRING Black holes forming complex gas pillars with straight or curved Herbig Haro objects at the top.
Some of them seem to race through the nebula.

Two straight Herbig haro objects are visible here.

Curved Herbig Haro objects are visible (below)

EAGLE NEBULA and the origin for pillars of creation

THE EAGLE NEBULA is the most obvious example of splitting and pairing micro black holes.

A GREAT basic example for universal complexity.

(double click for enlargement)
Below: the Spire.

Dust Pillars