Examples of NEW PARADIGM Splitting and Pairing Accelerated MASSLESS (Micro) Black Holes.

Posters on the Quantum FFF model

2012-01-24T12:25:00.000-08:00

Trantula Nebula, and other examples of different sized new paradigm Black Hole cooperation. e+ e- annihilation and gas production seems to be dependent on black hole horizon curvation

2011-11-15T02:38:00.000-08:00

Different sized new paradigm black holes in the Tarantula Nebula.

Conclusion: Giant Galaxy Anchor black holes (GABHs) around stable Galaxies, are not easy detectable, only as dark matter blobs.

Galaxy anchor black holes like those present at both sides of Cygnus A, must be smaller and have smaller event horizon curvation to be able to produce lots of gas and plasma, found around these two dumbbell blobs!
Conclusion Cygnus A is not the start of a full scale Galaxy far away, but a small open star cluster created by dumbbell structured black holes, even inside our own Milky Way.

Cygnus A.

Poster: New massless Black Hole paradigm leading to horizon e-e+ production annihilation and Quark formation.

How elliptical Galaxies like the Sombrero Galaxy are made according to Q-FFF Theory. Small and large Galaxies -with small and large GABH systems- seem to have merged into the Sombrero Galaxy.

18-11-2011: See this: NEWS:

Astronomers Reveal Galaxies' Most Elusive Secrets.

Hubble found distant mass in Galaxy envelopes!! PLACE: around a possible GABH location.

We are waiting for the discovery of GABHs Galaxy Anchor Black holes, by so called lensing effects on background sources by these black holes (dark matter) seen by Hubble. Perhaps, the astronomers keep it secret for the public for a while.

See: The tale of two Galaxies.

Galaxies Are the Ultimate Recyclers, NASA's Hubble Confirms.

What is the difference between these two Galaxy types, according to Q-FFF Theory??

Simply that the Galaxy connected GABHs can cooperate with other GABHs belonging to other nearby Galaxies. As a result, these distant GABHs will be able to attrackt the gas from neighbouring Galaxy.

So only if here are more galaxies in the neighborhood, this could be the case.

In all other cases, the return of the expelled gas will be certain by the attraction forces of the own galaxy GABHs.

QUANTUM FFF Theory.

2011-04-05T08:43:00.001-07:00

Breaking news as a support for Quantum FFF theory: 7 october 2011.
The news from Dublin is that Edward Witten will be in town soon to give the Hamilton Lecture, with the Irish Times reporting that Witten’s Hamilton Lecture will abandon string theory, however, in favour of knots, with a talk entitled: The Quantum Theory of Knots.
Witten describes knot theory as being able to delve into the deep recesses of mathematical research but also as something that can be explained in “down-to- earth terms that everyone can understand”.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/sciencetoday/2011/0929/1224304927736.html

News: 24 may 2011: First Observation of the Dynamical Casimir Effect
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26813/?ref=rss
The vacuum of space is not empty. In fact, quantum theory predicts that it teems with virtual particles flitting in and out of existence."

QUANTUM FFF Theory.

Quantum FFF theory states, that the vacuum is seeded with fast oscillating massless Higgs particles, oscillating along a complex chiral tetrahedral vacuum lattice with the Planck scale.
The vacuum lattice has the ability to transfer Photon/Gluon/Neutrino and Graviton FORM information in bunches of Higgs oscillations with the local speed of light.
The massless Higgs particles are supposed to be the driving force of all propeller shaped Fermions by scattering processes and give Fermions a double axed spin.
The first Fermion propeller spin axis is supposed to point into the direction of absolute motion through the vacuum lattice to compensate for the net-resistance of the vacuum lattice. (resulting into the Davies/Unruh effect)
The second axis of Fermion spin is supposed to be aligned with the Magnetic poles of the Fermion radiating two different kinds of magnetic monopole photons.
The Graviton and Electric photon radiation is supposed to radiate with an equatorial distribution to the second spin axis.

As a FIRST consequence there are no attraction forces on Fermions in the universe.
Gravity seems to be the result of two different impulse arrays: the massless Higgs impulse array and the (less effective) massless Graviton impulse array. (Higgs is the Dark Energy Particle)
So we may call this system "GRAVITY DUALITY"

As a SECOND consequence, Black holes suffer only from Higgs impulses and NO gravitons can escape the black hole. The Black hole nucleus is supposed to be a super dense knot of Higgs particles, which act as Dark Matter particles inside a Dark Matter Black Hole.
Only the statistical sum of the different kinds of Higgs-Photon vacuum impulses from all directions on Fermions are responsible for all energetic phenomena in the universe.

As a THIRD consequence, All Fermion and Photon particles are supposed to be entangled for all wavefunction collapses by a new form of entanglement between at least TWO copy Multiverses.
This Multiversal entanglement can be called Consciousness. Intelligent systems seems have a retardation system for the entanglement process of wavefunction collapse, which is able to produce human responsibility and human moral.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
http://vixra.org/author/Leo_Vuyk

keywords:
Higgs Dark Matter Black Hole, Higgs Dark Matter Particle, Higgs Dark Energy Particle,

Accelerated starspot- and Gas pillar structures inside nebula

2011-03-30T08:56:00.000-07:00

The mystery of the Square Nebula's rings and shape solved, by new physics of the zero mass oscillating Higgs quantum vacuum around dual stellar new paradigm black holes.

Presentation of the double coned (9) vacuum structure around dual stellar anchor black holes. This double Blakc hole system is assumed to be also present inside all Herbig haro objects up to early spiral galaxies like Cygnus A.

Is there other evenidence for the double coned vacuum structure around stars?

YES, see:

Mysterious 'Ribbon' of Energy and Particles That Wrap Around Solar System's Heliosphere Isolated.

Here we present an explanation for the Mysterious 'Ribbon' of Energy around the solar system, based on the former image of SABH structure effects around MWC922.

Thus we expect the mysterious ribbon to be an extra support for dual Stellar Anchor Black Holes!! (SABHs)

Comparable three ring system: SN 1987 a

Starspots are supposed to be NEW paradigm micro black holes,

If these sunspots explode with the star, they seem to form different structures.

Three ring systems and double cone systems if the exploding star is equipped with so called dual SABHs ( stellar Anchor Black holes)

Examples: MWC922, SN 1987A, Cats Eye etc.

Single ring systems seem to form if no SABHs are present.

Examples: M16 with the eagle, Crab nebula, Helix nebula etc.

The BALL LIGHTNING - Mini BLACK HOLE relation and micro Comets

2010-12-14T06:31:00.000-08:00

My new e-book: Zero Point Energy Black Holes.

News:
Newscientist: 01 December 2010 by Wendy Zukerman

Space debris falling into the atmosphere may cause mysterious ball lightning.

Quote:"Thousands of people have seen floating orbs of light, sometimes during thunderstorms, but their origin has never been established.
Earlier this year, scientists proposed that ball lightning was merely a hallucination caused by magnetic fluctuations during storms.
However, the weather was clear when Don Vernon, a farmer in Queensland, Australia, spotted two green balls descending from the sky on 16 May 2006. Oddly, the second rolled down a hill, bounced over a rock and then vanished."

My own research produced in the near past two other interesting examples of FIREBALLS examples both presented as videos found on youtube.

The first video shows a DOUBLE TAILED fireball falling down to earth.

The second video shows the baffling result of High altitude Sprites and Elves research by the Langmuir Laboratory (USA).
This video is reason to assume that also SPRITES may cause ball lightning and even micro Comets.

FIRE BALLS first go DOWN and then go UP again!!
Probably by the same mechanism (plasma tail) as Ball Lightning seems to be PUSHED AGAINST THE WIND DIRECTION.

Other examples:
This photo is made by Werner Burger in the mountain area called Montafon in Austria.

This photo is made in 1987, Nagano, Japan: see also Wikipedia:

The vapour trail is washed out by the opposing wind.

This is reason to assume that also ball lightning is based on my NEW paradigm for (micro) black holes

Black holes are equipped with a Fermion repelling globular horizon, able to produce a Quark Gluon plasma as a base for Hydrogen and Oxigen and water (vapour)

Comets seem to produce even CO2 ice!!

(see old Comet Hyperion.)

Comet Hartley 2 hides two gas jets spewing micro black holes.

2010-11-05T00:43:00.000-07:00

Comet Hartley 2 hides two gas jets spewing (new paradigm) micro black holes in its dumbbell shaped double nucleus able to produce H2O!!! and warm up the ice, see new evidence below!
breaking news:5-04-2011,
Liquid water found inside Comet Wild 2!!
For the first time, scientists have found convincing evidence for the presence of liquid water in a comet, shattering the current paradigm that comets never get warm enough to melt the ice that makes up the bulk of their material.
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-frozen-comet-watery-scientists.html

This photo suggests that a new pairing and splitting black hole paradigm is needed. It is a clear support that black holes are proliferated at all scales in the universe, they seem to have a Fermion repelling and gas producing horizon. Thus, new physics is needed.
Mind also the "smooth waist" of the dumbbell shaped icy mass with two distinct spots of concentrated jets.
See also: Sciencedaily
"Deep Impact Spacecraft Successfully Flies by Comet Hartley 2"

CONTENTS DATED 8 FEBR 2010

2010-02-08T04:48:00.000-08:00

Do black holes break up? they split into two or more pieces by the collision with other black holes, but they seem to pair also.

2009;
A Swarm of Small Black Holes Near The Galactic Centre
New Paradigm Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) outside Galaxies
Splitting Black Holes, the Origin of Gamma Ray Bursts GRBs?
BH Examples inside Supernova Remnants
BH Examples inside Planetary Nebula
BH Examples of Single Headed Pillars
BH Examples of Planar Ridge Formations
BH Examples of Double Armed Herbig Haro Objects

Splitting and Pairing Black Holes and the New Paradigm
First Amino Acid Found on a Comet
The Origin of Universal Complexity and Gas Concentrations
Why are Early Galaxies so Strangely Compact?
Small Comet Production by a Peculiar Solar Flare

Galaxy Cannonballs in the Early Universe
New Micro Black holes, Accelerated by Unstable
'Sigmoids' are S-shaped Structures on the Sun's Surface
New Gravity Model: DOUBLE LE SAGE Gravity or HIGGS
Double LeSage Gravity Solutions for the Solar Eclipse Gravity

3x Solar Eclipse Gravity Variations Explained
Alternative Hawking Radiation of Micro Black Holes
Are Comets Micro Black Holes Within a Dirty Snowball.
Do (micro) Black Holes Extract Energy from the Vacuum
Micro Black Holes are Everywhere, even inside Sunspots

Magnetic X-Ray Interference as the Origin of all
Sprites and Elves as the Origin of Small Comets and Ball lightning
Examples of Ball Lightning and Small Comets
Examples of Large Ball Lightnings or Small Comets in space
Evidence for external Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)

The Milky Way Centre: No Giant Black Hole!

2008;
The CARINA Nebula
The CRAB Nebula
The EAGLE Nebula
Peculiar Comets with Anti tails or Multiple Tails
Examples of Binary Black Holes: Star Forming
Why Black Holes Split and Pair to Form Stars
Ball Lightning Examples
Postscript

TRUNCATED TETRAHEDRON SPACE of the OSCILLATING HIGGS LATTICE.

2010-01-26T09:10:00.000-08:00

TRUNCATED TETRAHEDRON LATTICE SPACE STRUCTURE or HOW THE OSCILLATING HIGGS LATTICE IS ABLE TO MIMIC RELATIVITY RULES.
see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

Truncated tetrahedron space (lattice) around a black hole.

RECENT IMAGES

2010-01-23T12:40:00.000-08:00

Spitzer image of the Crab nebula, showing multiple accelerated trailing micro black holes (former starspots like sun pots, pink colored in infra red) which are also seen by the Chandra observatory in x-Ray.

(double click on image)

see also: Examples of supernova remnants:

http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/09/bh-examples-inside-supernova-remnants.html

Recent Chandra image of two trailing micro black holes leaving x-ray tails behind!!

ScienceDaily (Jan. 23, 2010) — Astronomer were surprised to find two distinct "tails" found on a long tail of gas that is believed to be forming stars where few stars have been formed before.

A SWARM Of Black Holes Near The Galactic Center, NO MONSTER BLACK HOLE !

2009-12-06T00:30:00.001-08:00

A Swarm Of Black Holes Near The Galactic supermassive MONSTER black hole in the Center!http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/01/050111114024.htm

"An ongoing Chandra program that monitors a region around the Milky Way's supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*) found four bright, variable X-ray sources (circles) EVEN WITHIN 3 light years of Sgr A*"!
"Although the region around Sgr A* is crowded with stars, we expected that there was only a 20 percent chance that we would find even one X-ray binary within a three-light-year radius," said Muno. "The observed high concentration of these sources implies that a huge number of black holes and neutron stars have gathered in the center of the Galaxy."

HOW CLOSE TO THE MONSTER BLACK HOLE CAN SUCH SMALL STELLAR MASS BHS EXIST before they are eaten by the monster, 3 lightyears?

ANSWER: THERE IS NO MONSTER BH IN THE CENTER OF SPIRAL GALAXIES.

THERE IS ONLY A LOCAL WHITE (GREY) HOLE IN THE LOCAL VACUUM STRUCTURE ORIGINATED BY AT LEAST TWO PRIMORDIAL MONSTER BHs LOCATED OUTSIDE THE GALAXY!

New paradigm Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) outside Galaxies, the origine of dark matter Halos with point sources.

2009-10-15T10:07:00.000-07:00

What is the reason that massive galaxies and colossal black holes where formed in the early universe?

The origin must be that the big bang could be compared with the “splitting” of the colossal Big Crunch black hole, as remnant of the contracting former raspberry multiverse.

See the CPT symmetric Big Bang splitting

See also recent astronomical evidences:

Massive Galaxies Formed When Universe Was Young, New Findings Suggest

Colossal Black Holes Common In Early Universe, Spectacular Galactic Collision Suggests

This Hubble Space Telescope composite image shows a ghostly ring of "dark matter point sources"in the galaxy cluster Cl 0024+17.

Why is this dark matter speroid, shaped like a rugby ball (prolate) and not like a grape fruit (oblate)? see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

Related to the sketch above:

The distance between opposing MONSTER Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) is supposed to be not the same inside the more complex merger galaxies.

Related to the sketch above:

Just in between the so called Galaxy Anchor Black holes (GABHs) located at opposing sides of the galaxies (1), special vacuum structure at location (2) coined: WHITE OR GREY HOLE, is the origin of "vacuum pressure" on Fermions to clump together and form the Galaxy.

As a result most gas is concentrated in the galaxy by vacuum pressure or "Casimir force"
However IF TWO OR MORE GALAXY ANCHOR BLACK HOLES are located at the same side of the spiral galaxy, then also at location (1); around these GABHs and also at location (15): just in between these BHs a special vacuum structure are supposed to be the origin of gas concentration and the origine of DWARF ( SPHEROIDAL) GALAXIES and Globular clusters.

.LARGE SCALE CASIMIR FORCES (Higgs qantum curves) AROUND TWO BLACK HOLES, kept at a stable distance by the ( Herbig Haro) electron jets.
(double click for enlargement)

An other perfect example of Galaxy external black hole action.

"Black hole caught zapping galaxy into existence?"
ESO 46/09 - Science Release, 30 November 2009
http://elendil.vox.com/library/post/eso-4609---science-release---black-hole-caught-zapping-galaxy-into-existence.html
(quote) says Knud Jahnke, who led the observations performed at the VLT. “However, we did not find any. (galaxies around the quasar) Instead we discovered that an apparently unrelated galaxy in the quasar’s immediate neighbourhood is producing stars at a frantic rate.”
These observations have provided a surprising new take on the system. While no trace of stars is revealed around the black hole, (the QUASAR) its companion galaxy is extremely rich in bright and very young stars. It is forming stars at a rate equivalent to about 350 Suns per year, one hundred times more than rates for typical galaxies in the local Universe.

Earlier observations had shown that the companion galaxy is, in fact, under fire: the quasar is spewing a jet of highly energetic particles towards its companion, accompanied by a stream of fast-moving gas. The injection of matter and energy into the galaxy indicates that the quasar itself might be inducing the formation of stars and thereby creating its own host galaxy; in such a scenario, galaxies would have evolved from clouds of gas hit by the energetic jets emerging from quasars.

See also:
Quasar induced galaxy formation: a new paradigm ?
Authors: D. Elbaz, K. Jahnke et al.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.2923

At the same time we may assume that our sun is the remnant of an open star cluster, better: our solar system is the remnant of an open star cluster created by two "STELLAR ANCHOR BLACK HOLES" (SABHs) and the result of a former Herbig Haro object!!
This NEW black hole model is even the base for my explanation of the so called pioneer anomaly. See:

As a consequence there seem to be not only stellar anchor black holes but even Galaxy anchor black holes, the base for galaxy form and ( quick) formation.

A possible indication for the influence of SOLAR anchor black holes, could be found in the next article about the evidence that the gravitational constant varies with orientation.

Experimental evidence that the gravitational constant varies

with orientation.

by Mikhail L. Gershteynâˆ—†, Lev I. Gershteyn†, Arkady Gershteyn†, Oleg V. Karagioz‡

http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0202/0202058.pdf

see also an other support for the sun as an open star cluster remnant: "Gould's star belt"
Orion's dark secret: Violence shaped the night sky
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427350.900-orions-dark-secret-violence-shaped-the-night-sky.html

"It is a sizeable structure, some 3000 light years across, and can be traced as a bright band of stars tilted at about 20 degrees to the Milky Way. Within it are several thousand high-mass stars as well as up to a million low-mass ones. Most importantly, these stars appear to have formed separately from the rest of the stars in the galaxy - and that's what makes them so interesting.

"Gould's belt is not part of the spiral structure," says Fernando Comerón of the European Southern Observatory in Garching, Germany, who has been studying the belt for more than 30 years. "It must have been triggered by some local, violent event." But what caused that event?"

Additional message:

Surprize: Quasars don't show redshift variation related to our distance!

Supernovae show this "time dilation" in the speed at which they fade - far-off explosions seem to dim more slowly than those nearby. But when Mike Hawkins of the Royal Observatory in Edinburgh, UK, looked at light from quasars he found no time dilation.
Time waits for no quasar – even though it should
Newscientist, 08 April 2010 by Marcus Chown
Magazine issue 2755.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627554.200-time-waits-for-no-quasar--even-though-it-should.html

BREAKING NEWS:
HANNY'S VOORWERP is a recent evidence of GALAXY ANCHOR BLACK HOLES. in this case near the galaxy IC 2497.
This Hubble photo reveals (by chance of the green Quasar back lighting) the existence of gas concentrations around the postulated galaxy anchor black holes.
see Hubble photo below:

SPLITTING BLACK HOLES, the origin of Gamma Ray Bursts GRBs.

2009-09-30T00:54:00.000-07:00

There is a Worldwide Hunt To Solve The Mystery Of Gamma-Ray Bursts.
see:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080216114853.htm

In my opinion, CATAPULT ejection of gamma rays, could be the origin of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). How the catapult mechanism should work is presented here in simple sketches. For more details see this blog and:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/08/new-book.html

Two approaching equal sized black holes are supposed not to split but originate a Herbig Haro object, often found inside star forming nebula.
However we found multiple examples, e.g. inside the EAGLE NEBULA of traces of “splitting black holes”.

We suggest that a possible splitting process should be triggered by the collision of two unequal sized black holes. The smaller black hole is supposed to be able to split the larger black hole by its concentrated electron jet and local vacuum deformation. (see figure)
The result however is that the splitting process unleashes a BURST of electrons in-between the parts of the splitted black hole which can be described as a CATAPULT ejection.
As a consequence however, this Gamma ray Burst ejection should be “one sided” in stead of the two-sided ejection as interpretation of GRBs by mainstream astronomy.
At the same time this seems a rational base for the fact that Gamma Ray bursts are so rare and able to travel well focussed over long (cosmological) distances.

BH EXAMPLES INSIDE SUPERNOVA REMNANTS

2009-09-02T03:43:00.000-07:00

Multiple linear- curved- and double gas pillars, left behind by accelerated micro black holes (former STARpots) inside the Crab Nebula

BH EXAMPLES INSIDE PLANETARY NEBULA

2009-09-02T03:41:00.000-07:00

These MICRO BHs are supposed to be former "sunspots".

They seem able to resist the stellar explosion, which is in line with the new BH paradigm.

BH EXAMPLES OF SINGLE HEADED PILLARS

2009-09-02T03:37:00.000-07:00

BH EXAMPLES OF PLANAR RIDGE FORMATIONS

2009-09-02T03:36:00.000-07:00

BH EXAMPLES OF DOUBLE ARMED or HERBIG HARO OBJECTS

2009-09-02T03:34:00.000-07:00

hh555 HERBIG HARO OBJECT IN THE PELICAN NEBULA.

TWO ARMED OBJECT IN CARINA

TWO HERBIG HARO OBJECTS ON TOP OF GAS PILLARS IN THE CARINA NEBULA

SPLITTING AND PAIRING BLACK HOLES and THE NEW PARADIGM

2009-08-26T05:06:00.000-07:00

Why is it, that some pairing black holes form a decent pair of stable star forming SABHs (star forming HH objects) or GABHs ( Galaxy formation) and other pairing black holes do the opposite and trigger a spitting process? (as found in the Eagle nebula.)
Suggestion: decent pairing black hole pairs have the same size! Conclusion, the universe seems to be aiming to equalize black hole sizes on a local scale. (see below)

COULD WE IMAGINE THE PARING OF BLACK HOLES?

Two equal sized black holes are supposed not to split but make a Herbig Haro object.

Could we imagine the splitting of a black hole, by the "collision" of two unequal black hloles?

Is this splitting process perhaps the main origin of so called Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs)?

Then there is reason to suggest that these GRBs could be originated even inside our own Galaxy nebula. Statistically however, there seems to be no reason for an exclusive Nebula origine.

Based on statistics, it seems that the main origin of GRBs must be found on a larger scale at cosmological distances, where so called Galaxy Anchor Black holes (outside Galaxies) tend to group between merging Galaxies and approaching Galaxies inside Galaxy clusters.

Found: first left handed amino acid on a comet

2009-08-18T09:25:00.000-07:00

"The discovery of glycine in a comet supports the idea that the fundamental building blocks of life are prevalent in space, and strengthens the argument that life in the universe may be common rather than rare," said Dr. Carl Pilcher, Director of the NASA Astrobiology Institute which co-funded the research.

Found: first LEFT HANDED amino acid on a comet
New scientist,17 August 2009 by Maggie McKee see:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17628-found-first-amino-acid-on-a-comet.html

Left handed amino acid seems to be created inside comets like wild 2.

as a result, there is a firm reason to postulate:

1: that we need a new black hole paradigm to solve this.

2: that the vacuum seems to have chiral abilities to be responsible for the creation of only left handed amino acids.

3: that we need a new standard model of elementary particles, which is able to form atomic anti-symmetry out of symmetric vacuum Higgs particles.
If the new black hole paradigm described on this blog, include micro black holes ( equipped with a small fermion repelling horizon) as the origin of comets, then hydrogen gas and more complex amino acids, may be produced together with water molecules around its hot micro black hole nucleus.

http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/07/small-comet-production-by-solar.html

http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/04/black-holes-accelerated-by-pushing.html

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/04/mainstream-physics-is-not-able-to.html
Conclusion:

The origin of life seems to be connected to Comets.

The origin of Comets seems to be connected stellar flares.

The so called missing mass problem of starforming regions could be solved.

THE INTERNAL HEAT OF THE EARTH AND NEW PARADIGM BLACK HOLES.

The internal HEAT source of the Earth should be found in the existence of internal new paradigm black holes being the remnants of Comet nuclei, crashing into the Earth in the past, just as we have experienced by the Schoemaker-Levy 9 Comet impact on Jupiter and Sungrazer Comets into the Sun.
New paradigm black holes are supposed to have a small globular Fermion repelling horizon.
Able to stay inside the earth without consuming it and responsible for electric currents and magnetism.

The concequences of this new black hole paradigm however is:

1, that the universe is interpreted as a fully symmetrical multiverse in raspberry form with a real particle based entangled quantum system, with digital alike features.

2, that the universal vacuum is interpreted as a linear energetic oscillating particle based "space frame" in the form of an incomplete 3-D tetra/octahedron lattice, with a fixed chirality left or right for individual (sub) universes and a lattice length of the Planck Length. That the energy of all these oscillations is the origin of so called "Dark Energy" which is compensated by the negative (Dark) energy of the vacuum oscillations within the distant anti-mirror entangled Universe.

3, That the vacuum is acting on objects (quarks and Leptons) in FREE FALL in the form of mutual compensating resistance and propulsion by the vacuum, originating real Lorentz Transformations , Local Time and Inertia.

4, that the universe is created without "broken symmetry" by a 3-Dymensional semi-cold Fractal Big Bang out of a "Big Crunch Black Hole nucleus" with a finite particle content. That there is always a mirror symmetry between opposite parts (universes) of the (Raspberry shaped) globular shell of semi-cold Big Bang Fractal expansion down to the smallest sub-quantum scale.

5, that as a result, an even set of anti-COPY universes will exist, equipped with mutual so called "anti-mirror symmetry", which is present not only at the quantum level but on all levels of existence, up to humans.

6, that real Toroidal shaped unifying vacuum particles dubbed "Higgs-Virgin particles" can change shape, by mutual collision or collision with fermions into other singular particles, which are able to combine into compound quark particles like quarks or "massive" Leptons (Muon and Tau) .

7, that each elementary or vacuum particle is accompanied by its "shadow (anti) particle" for universal memory and guiding reasons. That there are indications that there is "shadow matter" on all levels of existence. (the explanation of single particle- dual slit interference experiments)

8, that the oscillating vacuum particles are the only energy source in the universe, "pushing around" all real but "complex spinning" propeller shaped particles, (Fermions).

9, that Photons are "short living" (<1 cm trajectory) single shaped particles, originated by each collision of a vacuum particle with Quarks or Leptons. After <1cm, the photon pops back as a vacuum particle, initiating a photonic information wave. Within the 1 cm boundary the photon is supposed to be able to compute and file its digital direction in the vacuum lattice, its local lightspeed based on different micro amplitudes inside the Vacuum Lattice and its polarization plane.

10, that all inertial motion of matter in the local vacuum frame is maintained on what is coined real "Lorentz polarization" of propeller shaped Quarks or Leptons. Quarks and Leptons are supposed to be rigid particles propelled by the oscillating vacuum itself. The Lorentz polarization is supposed to guide the propeller particles main axis, to overcome the vacuum frame resistance. That the local oscillating vacuum frame and the absolute speed of matter through the vacuum frame, is responsible for the jitter of Quarks or Leptons, which is responsible for local Time and Mass (real Lorentz transformations) .

11. that black hole nuclei tend to explode if they are not stabilized by enough vacuum pressure, originated by the vacuum oscillations. All black holes (young or old) "eat" or absorb the vacuum particles which originate a strong positive space frame curvation. Black Holes are supposed to be responsible for the Hubble redshift, for so called "Dark Matter" effects and for the Contraction of the Universe, which will collapse on itself.

12, that Cosmological time is supposed to be originated by the absorption of the vacuum by all black holes, which create Cosmological pulsating effects within long periods. For our Galaxy (about 13.000 years by Galaxy center explosions, suggested by P. LaViolette) and finally for the pulsation of the universal Big Bang- Big Crunch system, (by all black holes together) originating Cosmological Time.

Conclusion: The Universe is made by evaporation of the nucleus of a Giant virgin Big Crunch Black Hole and is not expanding but contracting aiming again to a Big Crunch.

For new black hole paradigms see also:
Examples of Splitting and Pairing black holes etc blog.
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/

Leo Vuyk.

THE ORIGIN OF UNIVERSAL COMPLEXITY AND GAS CONCETRATION

2009-08-11T23:13:00.000-07:00

Breaking news: 2010: First Evidence for Magnetic Field in Protostar Jet: Magnetism Common to All Cosmic Jets?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101125202011.htm
Astronomers have found the first evidence of a magnetic field in a jet of material ejected from a young star, a discovery that points toward future breakthroughs in understanding the nature of all types of cosmic jets and of the role of magnetic fields in star formation.
(End quotation)
At last, the mainstream is thinking into the right direction of new negative charged electron based jets created by double black holes located at both sides of stars Herbig haro systems and galaxies.

These former star-spots (micro black holes) are travelling to the center of the PN, they seek at least one other micro black hole and form together a new dumbbell gas concentration system.
This pairing system is supposed to be the basic origin of universal complexity via Super Nova and later Planetary Nebula,
in addition to the original Lyman Alpha distribution of gas concentrating black holes of the Big Bang Inflation epoch.

Why are early galaxies so strangely compact?

2009-08-06T05:40:00.000-07:00

Why are early galaxies so strangely compact?
Early Galaxies show a much larger mass-star content ratio than we do inside our local universe.
Are these galaxies more massive (by more dark matter?) or does their gravity efficiency change, (by more dark energy content)

Stars in this distant galaxy, move at stunning speeds — greater than 1 million mph, astronomers have revealed. (space.com – Wed Aug 5, 2009,1:16 pm ET)

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090805-hyperactive-galaxies.html

These hyperactive stars move at about twice the speed of our sun through the Milky Way, because their host galaxy is very massive, yet strangely compact. The scene, which has theorists baffled, is 11 billion light-years away.

Given its distance of 11 billion light-years, galaxy 1255-0 is seen as it existed 11 billion years ago, less than 3 billion years after the theoretical Big Bang.
Something wrong?
Somehow, galaxies from the young universe grow in size but not in mass– they spread out but maintain their overall heft – to become the high-mass full sized galaxies we see today.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/03/backreaction-lee-smolins-trouble-with.html

In my perspective, there are two options:
Are these galaxies more massive (by more dark matter?) or does their gravity efficiency change, (by a larger dark energy content)
If Higgs vacuum particles are able to change into matter and radiation, then matter is concentrated space, then we may presume that the gravity efficiency is decreasing over time after the big bang, because the local dark energy content (or Higgs energy) is decreasing.
In other words, the Planck length is shorter in the early universe and the vacuum as a result is more dense and energetic in its pushing force on fermions (see double Le Sage gravity theory).
Reason to accept that the shorter Planck length is also the origin of the Hubble redshift.
As a result this is a clear support for a cyclic bouncing universe!

Question:
What is the effect of a shorter Planck length and how we could imagine spacetime effects?
In my perspective, a shorter Planck length should not influence the local time created by the oscillations of a caesium atom.
The caesium atom oscillations are supposed to be related to a fixed number of collisions with Higgs particles which are supposed to be active along the chiral 3-Dimensional vacuum lattice.
If all the Higgs oscillations in the whole universe are synchronized going up and down at the same moment, then the local time is independent of the length of the Planck trajectory length.

Small Comet production by a peculiar Solar Flare interference as a sort Birkeland effect?

2009-07-28T10:04:00.000-07:00

For, the need for a black hole paradigm shift,
By Mario Rabinowitz, named “Black Hole Paradoxes”
see:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0412101

See also:
NASA's Polar Spacecraft Confirms ...Small Comets are Pelting Earth,
By Louis Frank.
http://smallcomets.physics.uiowa.edu/may28-1.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZgthD5u9IY&NR=1&feature=fvwp

What goes DOWN, sometimes goes UP again.

see:
SPRITES AND ELVES AS THE ORIGIN OF SMALL COMETS AND LARGE BALL LIGHTNINGS
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/02/sprites-and-elves-as-origin-of-small.html

(with The Langmuir video included)

The origin of micro Comets and Ball lightning.
(What goes DOWN sometimes goes UP)

18 years ago during heavy thunderstorm in the Netherlands, a photo camera with automatic shutter recorded strange bead lightning streaks with interesting curvature.
At the end of some streaks a fire ball was visible.
Reconstruction of the curvature of the bead lightning suggested that all the streaks should have some relation to each other and the same frequency.
See: Rigid Gluonium Knots and Ball lightning
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/3-d-pictures-in-sky-written-by.html

Could it be, that electromagnetic wave interference (with the same wavelength) was responsible for this phenomenon?
The answer was YES if there was also an x-ray (or Gamma-ray) component into play.
Why do we need this x-ray phenomenon? Because not all lightning strokes produce bead lightning or fireball ball lightning.
There must be some irregular component responsible for the incidental emerging of Ball lightning and Bead lightning.
This component could be found in the recent experiment results of professor J.R.Dwyer, ( Geospace physics lab,FIT). He discovered the x-rays emission from laboratory sparks and lightning strokes.
(see: The observation of x-ray bursts produced by 1.5 MV laboratory sparks in air
http://my.fit.edu/~jdwyer/AGU2005poster.doc
Recently also M.Rahman (Upsala university Sweden) made comparable experiments: “x-rays from 80 cm long sparks in air” with x-ray emission results, see:
http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/PDF/AGU/Rahman_et_al_2008.pdf

However, if strong electromagnetic radiation and accompanying x-rays are responsible for ball lightning, then perhaps also (larger) ball lightning effects could be found in space at places with high discharge energies like so called SPRITES and ELVES or even near the solar surface OR NEAR so called BIRKELAND currents ON EARTH.
Judge for yourselves and look at the slow-motion video of Langmuir University of sprites and elves. See under: “Sprites and Elves as the origin of small Comets and large Ball Lightnings”
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/02/sprites-and-elves-as-origin-of-small.html

What you see is the production of lots of fireballs going down and partly after a while going up again!!! Just like the solar photo presenting at least four fireballs going down and ONE going upwards!! See; “Small Comet production by Solar flare curent interference” http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/

Sprite scientist described these fireball phenomena in conventional breakdown mechanisms of lightning strokes, such as streamers, down- and upward streamers. Only if streamers collide, then it is called a sprite bead. see: submillisecond imaging of sprite developement an structure. http://people.ee.duke.edu/~cummer/reprints/048_cummer06_grl_hsvsprites.pdf

Postulate:
All Comets, large Comets and even the smaller Sungrazers are originated as fireballs, by Solar electro magnetic field interference near to the solar surface as is shown in the photograph. Some of these Comets where able to produce or gather enough water molecules, during their journey away from the sun, to be influenced by the solar gravity field and become a more or less “Newtonian” elliptical orbit around the sun.
Ball lightning and small Comets are supposed to be produced by the interference of electromagnetic energy found inside Elves and Sprites.
Leo Vuyk.

Galaxy Cannonballs in the early universe, an example of splitting and pairing black holes

2009-07-02T00:00:00.001-07:00

Dual black holes as the electric engine of the universe at all universal scales.

From (Cannonball) galaxies down to starforming regions, HH objects, stars, Comets and Ball lightning. see below.

see also Newscientist video on missing dwarf galaxies :

http://brightcove.newscientist.com/services/player/bcpid1873822884?bctid=35244997001

Solar Power, Internal or External?
Electric Universe proponents claim that solar radiation energy production is external not internal.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050906solarpower.htm

SEE ALSO:
Magnetic fields play larger role in star formation than previously thought
September 9th, 2009
The simple picture of star formation calls for giant clouds of gas and dust to collapse inward due to gravity, growing denser and hotter until igniting nuclear fusion. In reality, forces other than gravity also influence the birth of stars. New research shows that cosmic magnetic fields play a more important role in star formation than previously thought.
http://www.physorg.com/news171720091.html

Cannonball Galaxies in the early universe explained

Astronomers have found a new clutch of tiny, dense galaxies that thrived in the early universe. But they still can't explain why the compact objects are nowhere to be found today.
Another team found that compact galaxies were still present when the universe was almost 5 billion years old, narrowing the amount of time that such galaxies would have to puff up to present sizes. (Newscientist) see:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17281-cosmic-cannonballs-found-in-early-universe.html

The solution? A new Black hole splitting Big bang paradigm described at:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

http://brightcove.newscientist.com/services/player/bcpid2227271001?bctid=35244997001

Black holes equipped with a Fermion repelling horizon seem to be able to pair and stay concentrated in groups with a gas compression zone in between.

PUFFING UP GALAXIES

Black holes equipped with a Fermion repelling horizon seem to be able to pair and stay concentrated in groups with a gas compression zone in between.
The “puffing up” of older galaxy or the expansion of the older galaxies with stellar halos, must be the result of the fast production of huge stars and medium sized supernova Black holes.
The stellar “sunspots” (micro cometary black holes) ejected during supernova explosions are supposed to be the origin of puffing up our present day Nebula in the form of Herbig Haro objects, the base for new open star clusters

NEW Micro Black holes, accelerated by unstable swinging gas tails. A new black hole paradigm is needed to understand universal complexity.

2009-04-27T22:08:00.000-07:00

What is the physics behind falling and raising micro Comets if they are in fact micro black holes? The growing gas tails should be responsible for this effect.

If by magnetic interference micro black holes are able to emerge around the earth and the sun, they are expected to start as "naked" singularities without a gas tail, and going down by gravity of the earth or sun.

However, if a gas bubble round this singularity has emerged, keeping a comfortable distance to the singularities nucleus by the Fermion repulsion horizon, then this gas bubble has the tendency to form a tail which points into the direction of the gravity origin.

As a result, this tail will push the micro black hole UP and away from the gravity origin!

Saturn's icy/spongy moon Hyperion,

the remains of a former Comet?

The globular inner structure of the ruptured icy moon Hyperion tells us the story of an old Comet left alone by its New Micro Black hole of creation.

It also is a strong evidence of the Fermion repelling horizon and complete atomic H2 production around NEW (micro) black holes, if the vacuum structure of our matterial universe, has a chiral preference for matter over anti matter .

see: http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/03/new-hawking-radiation-of-new-micro.html

'Sigmoids' are S-shaped structures on the sun's surface. A new example of ZPE COSMIC ELECTRIC GENERATION between pairing black holes?

2009-04-21T12:59:00.000-07:00

'Sigmoids' are S-shaped structures that appear intermittently on the sun's surface. Many produce eruptions of hot ionised gas, or plasma, such as coronal mass ejections and flares.
( NewScientist)
According to the new black hole paradigm, are Sigmoids a good example of PAIRING SUNSPOTS or mini black holes and the origin of Cosmic electric generators using the vacuum ZPE (Zero Point Energy) as propellant.
Such a FREE ENERGY generator is first recognized inside the Cygnus-A , Zwicky 18 and in Herbig Haro systems. see:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/01/new-interpretation-of-cygnus-will-lead.html

This is also a support for the new scale independent new black hole paradigm.
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/02/higgs-vacuum-energy-lensing-effect-and.html

As a consequence, electric currents should flow (as electron jets) along the S shape from the center of the S, into the two mini black holes located at both ends of the S.

Sungrazers and other mini Comets are supposed to be originated by the field interference of Sunspots.
The Sunspot x-ray- and magnetic field interference should be the real origin of the formation of micro black holes produced by this system, in the form of small Comets or Sungrazers.
Original article by NewScientist:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16999-sigmoids-on-the-sun-could-help-predict-space-storms.html

New gravity model: DOUBLE LE SAGE gravity or HIGGS-GRAVITON pushing gravity.

2009-04-15T02:18:00.000-07:00

Double Le Sage Gravity has two different pushing components. (Higgs and Gravitons)
First we have the oscillating Higgs particles oscillating along the edges of the tetrahedral lattice with the Planck scale, causing the so called Casimir effect and a part of the gravity.
All Fermions (so all mass) are radiating gravitons, which are a collision product of Higgs particles with Fermions. The Higgs particle changes form after this collision and travels with the speed of light away from the fermion.
Fermions are supposed to have a real FORM, they have a propeller form, able to spin in two directions by the impulses of the Higgs field.
Gravitons are assumed to have LESS pushing effect if they collide with Fermions han Higgs particles have.

As a consequence, the incoming Higgs particle pressure from outside a massive
object like the earth is larger than the Higgs–Graviton mixture pressure going out of the Earth. That is why the apple falls.
It is assumed that black holes are not able to radiate photons and even gravitons.

As a result a black hole has only incoming Higgs pressure at its horizon and the nucleus of the black hole is assumed to absorb the Higgs particles and the vacuum lattice at the same time. Space distortion is the result and even the change of speed of light. The edges of the lattice are elongated into the direction of the black hole and shortened perpendicular to it.

Globular vector bundle hedgehog to shows the complexity of gravity.

Double LE SAGE Gravity, originated by the combined scattering influence of Higgs pressure (3)(Casimir) and Graviton pressure (6) in the form of a vector Hedgehog. This vector Hedgehog is a basic element in the next explanation for well documented gravity anomalies.

The total Higgs pressure from outside acting on a mass like the earth, is larger than the Higgs pressure coming from the inside of that mass, because inside the earth, many Higgs particles are assumed to have changed by collision with Fermions into Gravitons.

Gravitons are supposed to originate less scattering pressure on Fermions than Higgs particles.

As a conequence, the double Le Sage gravity is supposed to be the result of the mutual scattering (push) influence of the oscillating local Higgs Field- together with the local Graviton scattering on Fermions.

The complicated Solar gravity system seems to be responsible for three in principle different kinds of gravity eclipse variations found by scientists.

The variations can be explained by the hypothesis that sunspots are micro black holes, which have a gravity lensing effect on the Higgs vacuum pressure. The Polar rotation of these sunspots combined with the sunspot cycle of 11 yearsm, seem to create an anti-symmetrical extra double- or dual Le Sage gravity effect. Both effects, are supposed to be responsible for the remarkable seemingly unpredictable differences in the gravity variations during Solar eclipses. See for details also: http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009_03_01_archive.html

Double LeSage gravity solutions for the Solar Eclipse Gravity anomalies found by Wang and Yang/ Mishra and Rao.

2009-03-19T06:00:00.000-07:00

Solar eclipse gravity anomalies explained by comparison of;
Woomera 2002. Lusaka 2001, Mohe 1997, and Dhoraji 1995 gravity measurement results, compared with the Sunspot distribution in those years and the double LeSage gravity proposed by the Quantum FFF theory.
For the Double LeSage gravity in Quantum FFF theory see:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0024v2.pdf

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

SIMPLIFIED SOLUTIONS (below) for comparable examples:

DOUBLE Le Sage gravity could solve the Wang and Yang eclipse anomalies.
The Wang and Yang eclipse gravity anomalies (Mohe 1997 and Lusaka 2001) can be explained by the introduction of a dual or double Le Sage gravity system.
Such a system is supposed to be based on the pressure differences between the impulse of Higgs and Graviton scattering on Fermions.
The concentrated Higgs- Graviton (vector) bundles have two types : A and B. They seem to introduce a lighthouse effect around the Sun.
Bundles with type A seem to be more concentrated and related to the equatorial plane of the Sun. Type A bundles seem to loose their influence on Earth if the inclination of the Sun with the line of sight is increasing. It is proposed that type A gravity is originated by the rotation of the Sun (drag effect)
Gravity bundles with type B (only Higgs without graviton influence) seem to be more widely beaming without much variation related to inclination with the line of sight.
It is proposed that type B gravity is originated by the dark matter content of Sunspots. ( Sunspots are assumed to be micro black holes, so sunspots are black holes! and Comets are black holes too!)

See for eclipse gravity variations:
Maurice Allais homepage:
http://www.allais.info/priorartdocs/angs.htm

see also: Newscientist: "does gravity change with the seasons" http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227046.500-does-gravity-change-with-the-seasons.html

3x Solar eclipse gravity variations explained by a double LE SAGE effect and massless micro black holes. (Sunspots)

2009-03-17T11:53:00.000-07:00

The double Le Sage gravity is supposed to be the result of the mutual scattering (push) influence of the oscillating local Higgs Field- together with the local Graviton scattering on Fermions.

The special equatorial Solar gravity seems to be responsible for three in principle different kinds of gravity eclipse variations found by different scientists.
This can be explained by the hypothesis that sunspots (you remember: massless micro black holes) have a gravity lensing affect on the Higgs vacuum (coined: B) and the Polar rotation of these sunspots also seem to create an anti-symmetrical extra double- or dual Le Sage gravity effect. (coined: A)
Both effects A and B, seem to be responsible for the remarkable differences in the gravity variations during Solar eclipses.

Alternative HAWKING RADIATION of (MICRO) BLACK HOLES

2009-03-02T23:57:00.000-08:00

If we accept the Quantum mechanical idea of the vacuum creation of Lepton pairs around a black holes, then only a minimal amount of (anti-)Leptons is supposed to be annihilated in the Comet case.
This is possible if the vacuum Higgs lattice has a chiral structure in combination with an opposite chirality for Leptons and Fermions!
As a result “left handed” chiral Positrons tend to "absorb" easier and more Gluons/Photons than Electrons do inside a “left handed” chiral vacuum.
Positrons seem to be able to form positive Quarks by "click-on" Gluon/Photon absorption. This "click-on" system facilitate Electrons to form negative charged Quarks.
This simple principle solves even the well known Big Bang anti-matter annihilation problem!
As a result, COMETS are spongy icy H2 balls created around micro black holes by the Quark Gluon plasma producing Black Hole horizon.

As a result, the positron has better chances to become a stable QUARK (by photon/gluon addition) than the electron. see: The CPT symmetric Multiverse by black hole Big Bang evaporation:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/03/backreaction-lee-smolins-trouble-with.html

To understand Micro black hole (MBH) characteristics we seem to need a new Hawking radiation model.

For particle models, see:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/01/introduction.html

According to this model, Micro black holes are supposed to show up as Ball lightning, Comets and Herbig Haro objects.

The NEW Hawking radiation presented here, goes back to 1973.
Soviet scientists Yakov Zeldovich and Alexander Starobinsky showed Hawking in 1973, that according to the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle, rotating black holes should create and emit particles.
My interpretation of the Higgs vacuum is that Black holes don't need rotation to repell all particles created by vacuum fluctuations due to their propeller structure and are even able to form QUARKS BY A NEW STANDARD MODEL of "click-on"photons/Gluons.
see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
Conclusion both QUARKS ( d and u) are created all together with electrons and positrons.

Hydroxyl (OH), Hydrogen and even complete water molecules seem to be possible as is found in Comets. This production of water by the micro black hole is supposed to be the real compensation for the continuous loss of water molecules by Comets.
Conclusion: Comets harbour micro black holes in their nuclei.
X-ray and even annihilation radiation effects are also a logic result of Comets. However, no annihilation radiation is found related to Comets untill now.

ARE COMETS MICRO BLACK HOLES WITH a dirty snowball cover and a NUCLEAR X-RAY PRODUCTION?

2009-03-02T08:24:00.000-08:00

The "Deep impact" of july 2005 on Comet Temple 1.

National Geographic newsletter. 4 april 2006.

Scientists are stumped by the behavior of the comet Tempel 1 after NASA sent the Deep Impact space probe hurtling into it last year some 83 million miles (133.5 million kilometers) from Earth.
The flare that resulted from the July 4 2005 collision was originally measured by optical telescopes as being a weak, five-day-long burst.

This suggested that only a small amount of water and other material had been released after impact.

But an analysis of x-ray images taken after the collision indicates that the flare lasted for a full 12 days and released about 250,000 tons (226,800 metric tons) of water in the form of ice-covered dust grains.

"There was disappointment that Deep Impact didn't cause a major optical outburst, but it did cause an x-ray outburst. Why that is, we don't know,'' said Dick Willingale, an astronomer at the University of Leicester in England whose team operated NASA's Swift X-Ray Telescope.

Willingate's team is puzzled as to why the x-ray observations of the impact's aftermath do not match the observations made by optical telescopes.

"When everyone said it was over, we were [actually] at the peak. We were just taking the data,'' Willingale said. "We realized we had something strange happen, but we didn't understand why.

"The important thing is [the flare] lasted for 12 days,'' Willingale continued. "It shouldn't have done that. The water was coming off so fast, it should've disappeared after a day or so. We don't know why [the strong x-rays] persisted for so long.!!

see: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0404_060404_deep_impact.html

The solution could be: that the deep impact made a temporary hole in the Comet crusty surface and uncovered the micro black hole x-ray radiation produced by the micro-Black hole Hydroxyl production around the nucleus.

THE FIRST X-RAY DISCOVERY OF COMETS.

X-Rays from Comet LINEAR Credit: Carey Lisse (STScI/UMD) et al., CXC, SAO, NASA
Explanation: Why do comets emit X-rays? First discovered during the passing of Comet Hyakutake in 1996, the reason a cold comet would produce hot X-rays has since remained a mystery. On July 14 2000, however, the orbiting Chandra X-ray Observatory was able to provide an image of passing Comet LINEAR, shown above, in enough detail to unravel the mystery. The key to the solution turns out to be the unusual wind of fast ions emitted by our Sun. These ions apparently collide with gas recently emitted by the comet and cause some ions to acquire a new electron. An electron that starts in a high-energy state will emit an X-ray as it falls in closer to the ion nucleus. As other comets move into the inner Solar System, this discovery should allow future study of the continually evolving gas cloud that surrounds comets as well as the composition of the solar wind.

THE MOST RECENT X-RAY OBSERVATION OF A COMET:
NASA SWIFT spots Lulin Comet: see:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/swift/bursts/lulin.html
This image of Comet Lulin taken Jan. 28 2009, merges data acquired by Swift's Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (blue and green) and X-Ray Telescope (red). At the time of the observation, the comet was 99.5 million miles from Earth and 115.3 million miles from the sun. Credit: NASA/Swift/Univ. of Leicester/Bodewits et al.

THE GRAIN PARTICLES OF COMET WILD 2.

About 10 percent of the mass of Wild 2 is estimated to be from particles transported out from hot inner zones to the cold zone where the comet formed. Researchers conclude that this is how these grains with unusual isotope ratios go incorporated into a comet.

Earlier research showed that the comet formed in the Kuiper Belt, outside the orbit of Neptune, and only recently entered the inner regions of the solar system.

But during its lifetime, Wild 2 gathered material that formed much closer to the sun.
http://www.topnews.in/parts-comet-wild-2-formed-close-sun-211382

This is an indication that Comets are not formed in the Kuiper belt but simply by solar interference and after black hole creation an Solar evaporating of its dirty ice nucleus will split and dye out like the Schoemaker comet.
From July 16 through July 22, 1994, pieces of an object designated as Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 collided with Jupiter.

Do (micro) black holes extract energy from the vacuum?

2009-02-26T23:54:00.000-08:00

Is there a future possibility to extract energy from the vacuum?
Is harnessing ball lightning perhaps the solution for our energy problem on Earth.
One of the most involved persons on this issue is Jack Sarfatti.
His latest paper is the next one:
The emergence of gravity etc. etc. Authors: Jack Sarfatti, Creon Levit (Submitted on 31 Jan 2009) http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0032
Abstract: We present a model for the origin of gravity, dark energy and dark matter: Dark energy and dark matter are residual pre-inflation false vacuum random zero point energy (w=-1) of large-scale negative, and short-scale positive pressure, respectively, corresponding to the "zero point" (incoherent) component of a superfluid (supersolid) ground state. Gravity, in contrast, arises from the 2nd order topological defects in the post-inflation virtual "condensate" (coherent) component.
For my personal contribution for a Higgs vacuum driven electron pump, see my book and pages 92-96:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1409210316/ref=sib_dp_ptu#reader-link
type: 92 in the search engine box and click on "page 92" to find more.

Micro Black Holes are everywhere, inside Sunspots, Comets, Ball Lightning and even Herbig Haro objects

2009-02-22T03:02:00.000-08:00

Based on observation of the ball lightning photo of mr. van Overhagen, the Langmuir video of fireball producing Sprites and the Sungrazer Comets, we may conclude that there are at least three ways of micro black hole production possible, leading to the existence of ball lightning, small Comets and large Comets.
1: Three-wave interference of ordinary lightning into ball lightning (see Overhagen photo)
2. Three wave interference of Sprite lightning into bigger ball lightning or small Comets ( see the Langmuir video)
3. Three wave interference of Stellar Electro magnetic eruptions into small and large Comets. The evidence of EM and x-rays is clearly found in this video:

http://www.livescience.com/common/media/video/player.php?videoRef=250407Sun_outburst

The fact that we observe very few ball lightning around strong lightning activity, is reason to assume that not only magnetic or electric energy but also x-ray interference energy is at stake.

(Message to the cyclesi group)

Thank you Bill for this new elongated LANMUIR LAB. video, because it tells me a crucial fact more than the shorter Langmuir video of the Sprite I had before.
It tells me that at the end of the down falling Sprite fireballs they GO UPWARDS!!!! Which supports my small Comet proposal:

See the new longer video:

http://www.livescience.com/common/media/video/player.php?videoRef=080607sprites

HYPERION the spongy but icy comet remains, abandoned by its nuclear micro black hole, has become a moon of Saturn.

MAGNETIC-X-RAY INTERFERENCE AS THE ORIGIN OF ALL BALL LIGHTNING AND COMETS

2009-02-20T06:23:00.000-08:00

(DOUBLE CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT)

The idea of the origin of natural and artificial ball lightning or small Comets, is that ONLY the postulated three-wave interference mechanism including at least one x-gamma ray component is needed to form a real particle KNOT inside the oscillating new Higgs vacuum lattice.
This KNOT ( or micro black hole) seems to be able to produce a macro CASIMER effect and violate the second law of thermodynamics by the Fermion repelling horizon.
I have no knowledge of measured x-gamma-ray production around artificial or natural ball lightning.
I only have knowledge of the fact that Comets sometimes emit x-rays and even have signs of anti matter annihilation.
These effects are in line with my new (micro) black hole theory.
The production of x-rays inside lightning strokes is well known and first observed by J.R.Dwyer, see:
http://my.fit.edu/~jdwyer/papers.htm
See also: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
For x-ray production related to discharges, see x rays from 80 cm long sparks in air:
http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/PDF/AGU/Rahman_et_al_2008.pdf
Multiple X-ray bursts from long discharges in air, C.V. Nguyen, A.P.J. van Deursen, U. Ebert, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 234012 (2008) [7 pages, 7 figures], paper

SPRITES AND ELVES AS THE ORIGIN OF SMALL COMETS AND LARGE BALL LIGHTNINGS

2009-02-20T06:13:00.000-08:00

Fireball photo by Jon Burnett, Sept 2003, the second photo was taken about 4 minutes later. You may observe that the speed of the fireball was not very high as meteors mostly used to be.
Secondly the brightness of the fireball is very much decreased in the second photo. This is an idication that the sunset reflection of the vapour trail, is responsible for most of the brightness and a support for the "Small Comet" hypothesis.

Fireball photo by Werner Burger in Montafon mountains Austria.
Werner reported that there was some dripping rain and far rumbling thunder.What we are able to observe on this photo, is that this fireball has a TAIL which seem to be produce a trail of (water) vapour.At the same time it looks as if some raindrops are accelerated with a "curve" into the direction of the falling fireball, which could be a sign of mass Dynamic attraction by the fireball.Some other "raindrops" seem to be linear accelerated more or less in line and keep up with the fireballs tail.These features seem to me a clear example of the violation of the second law of thermodynamics and a great support of my model for a NEW black hole theory.http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2007/02/higgs-vacuum-energy-lensing-effect-and.html

Below you find a LANGMUIR LABORATORY video of a Sprite in very slow motion, taken with 10.000 frames per second.
What you see is the production of multiple ball lighnings falling down.
My suggestion is, that all balls create a so called "pushing gas tail" to get an horizontal motion.
Only the largest falling balls are able to create a large enough pushing gas-tail to become a small COMET which is able to climb at higher altitudes, as the NASA videos show us.
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/02/sprites-and-elves-origin-of-small.html

For an even more detailed Langmuir video, with clear cut fireball production see;

For a double tailed small Comet, reflecting in the evening sun see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff1xZNddQIE&NR=1

Production of Fireballs as potential micro Comets going DOWN AND UPWARDS
inside Sprites: a LANGMUIR SLOW MOTION video,
10.000 frames per second.
We count that these fireballs run for about 10 kms in 1 second.
If this video is running on 25 frames/sec, the speed of these balls is about 4000 km/sec

EXAMPLES OF BALL LIGHTNING AND SMALL COMETS ON EARTH.

2009-02-20T05:35:00.000-08:00

This is a compilation of free moving fireballs found on youtube.

For comparizon reasons, this is a slow motion video of ordinary cloud to ground lightning.
The lightballs at the beginning of the stepped leaders are NOT ball lightnings!

EXAMPLES OF LARGE BLs or SMALL COMETS IN OUTER SPACE

2009-02-19T22:46:00.000-08:00

This small comet of a NASA ISS video, suddenly changes direction probably by a flip of the pushing tail.

This NASA ISS video show us the production of two Earth bound small Comets.

Small Asteroids are called bolides.
Small Fireballs at high altitude are called Near Earth Objects (NEOs)

Evidence for external Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)

2009-01-28T02:10:00.000-08:00

Andromeda (M31) image without visible external black hole (x-ray hotspot) structure.

It is well established that X-ray production should be present around black-hole sources due to interaction with local gas.
As a consequence we observe black hole locations around gaseous galaxies in space by x-ray images taken by the CHANDRA satellite.

Andromeda, (M31) and the Sombrero galaxy seem to be excellent examples. .
However in both cases the brightest x-ray sources are located far outside these galaxies.
This seems to be a clear support for a NEW black hole theory.

M31, with multiple x-ray hotspots (GABHs) around the galaxy.

Chandra x-ray image of Andromeda (above) with multiple x-ray hotspots (Galaxy Anchor black holes) around the Galaxy.

Most of the M31 x-ray sources are identified as Globular Clusters (GCs), obviously equipped with at least one central black hole.
As a matter of fact astronomers concluded that:
The brightest M31 x-ray (GC) sources tend to reside at large galactic distances outside the central bulge. See:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AAS...204.4917T
The X-ray dots are DECREASING IN DIAMETER towards THE CENTER OF THE GALAXY! This is a firm support for a NEW black hole theory introducing Fermion repelling horizons and massless Black holes.!
Evidence for external Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs)

THE MILKY WAY CENTRE: NO GIANT BLACK HOLE?!! ONLY SMALL ONES!

2009-01-07T12:29:00.000-08:00

If we explore this interesting image (see above) and the correlated text, we seem to miss any trail of a central giant black hole lurking.

HOW CAN?

WE CAN, IF WE CHANGE OUR STANDARD MODEL and ideas A LITTLE BIT.

SEE:

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/04/mainstream-physics-is-not-able-to.html

The center of our Galaxy and the giant black hole, is by the mainstream logically supposed to be located at the hart of Sagittarius A open star cluster see the star accelerations around the Sag A, the red cross :
http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/milkyway_bh/index.html
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081211.html
So if a giant black hole is located inside Sag A, it would be expected that around Sag A the gaseous structure of space around Sag A is strongly influenced by that Giant and e.g. lots of swirling gas trails are visible which is not .

The only visible trails are two elliptic grey filaments which could be the tell tails of two medium sized black holes, just as is suggested to be the origin of the other elliptic filaments visible around the two other open star clusters. (called Quintuplet and Arches cluster)

If black holes differ a little from the mainstream assumption, then there is a firm reason to suggest that the star accelerations also are possible in the middle TWO or even more DUAL medium sized black holes.
See also: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/04/mainstream-physics-is-not-able-to.html

NO GIANT black hole inside the Galaxy center?
The mainstream ideas about a Giant Milky way- central black hole are lately firmly supported by clear stellar acceleration profiles around the Sagittarius A cluster, see:
http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/milkyway_bh/index.html

However according to new combined Hubble images of the Sgt..A area there is no sign of any gaseous filamentary Vortex or elliptic structure.
Instead we see more than one clear elliptic filaments around the three stellar clusters called: Sagittarius A, Quintuplet and Arches cluster.
This seems to be a tell tale for more than one (at least three) barycentres as the origin of these open star clusters.
My conclusion based on a new interpretation of black hole splitting and paring
The center of the Milky way is supposed to be equipped with several medium sized DUAL black holes (BHs) forming circular visible gas filaments (elliptic trails) and in the barycenter in the middle between dual black holes: open star clusters like Sgt A, the Quintuplet and Arches cluster. Conclusion: there is NO Giant Black hole in the center of our galaxy.
http://migratingblackholes.blogspot.com/2009/01/milky-way-centre-no-giant-black-hole.html

The text below related to this image was made by: Astronomic picture of the day. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090107.html

The Galactic Core in Infrared Credit: Hubble: NASA, ESA, & D. Q. Wang (U. Mass, Amherst); Spitzer: NASA, JPL, & S. Stolovy (SSC/Caltech)
Explanation: What's happening at the center of our Milky Way Galaxy? To help find out, the orbiting Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes have combined their efforts to survey the region in unprecedented detail in infrared light. Infrared light is particularly useful for probing the Milky Way's center because visible light is more greatly obscured by dust. The above image encompasses over 2,000 images from the Hubble Space Telescope's NICMOS taken last year. The image spans 300 by 115 light years with such high resolution that structures only 20 times the size of our own Solar System are discernable. Clouds of glowing gas and dark dust as well as three large star clusters are visible. Magnetic fields may be channeling plasma along the upper left near the Arches Cluster, while energetic stellar winds are carving pillars near the Quintuplet Cluster on the lower left. The massive Central Cluster of stars surrounding Sagittarius A* is visible on the lower right. Why several central, bright, massive stars appear to be unassociated with these star clusters is not yet understood.

This description "NOT YET UNDERSTOOD" is in sharp contrast with former releases of the ESA study of 16 years on the center of the Galaxy, presented earlier, talking about the proof of the giant lurking black hole inside the Sagitarius complex see:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081211.html

THE CARINA NEBULA

2008-09-11T11:19:00.001-07:00

Examples of SPLITTING AND PAIRING Black holes forming complex gas pillars with straight or curved Herbig Haro objects at the top.
Some of them seem to race through the nebula.

Two straight Herbig haro objects are visible here.

Curved Herbig Haro objects are visible (below)

THE CRAB NEBULA

2008-09-11T03:32:00.003-07:00

Paired micro black holes in motion forming curved micro Herbig Haro objects in the Crab nebula..

The Crab nebula with 10.000 mini black hole shaped gas pillars.

It is assumed that the "sunspot black holes" of the former Crab star, are in an active pairing and splitting process leaving visible gas pillars and "curved" mini Herbi Haro objects behind.

EAGLE NEBULA

2008-09-11T03:32:00.001-07:00

THE EAGLE NEBULA is the most obvious example of splitting and pairing micro black holes.

A GREAT basic example for universal complexity.

(double click for enlargement)
Below: the Spire.

Dust Pillars

Peculiar Comets with Anti tails or multiple tails

2008-09-11T03:31:00.001-07:00

Comet Hyakutake 21-march 1996 with multiple tails in the form of jets and ion gas tail, 20 degrees long!. Photo: Herman Mikuz. Crni. Vrh. Obs. Slovenia.
A typical support for the micro black hole hypothesis.

Examples of binary black holes: star forming Stellar Anchor Black Holes (SABHs)

2008-09-11T02:26:00.001-07:00

Image of our Stellar Anchor Black Hole (SABH) system, supposed to be the remant of the former Herbig Haro system of the star forming open star cluster.

Breaking News:

Strange cosmic ray hotspots tell tales of dual Solar Anchor Black holes?

16:42 03 May 2011 by Anil Ananthaswamy

Cosmic rays crashing into the Earth over the South Pole appear to be coming from particular locations, rather than being distributed uniformly across the sky. Similar cosmic ray "hotspots" have been seen in the northern skies too, yet we know of no source close enough to produce this pattern.

"We don't know where they are coming from," says Stefan Westerhoff of the University of Wisconsin-Madison

See: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20436-strange-cosmic-ray-hotspots-stalk-southern-skies.html

See perhaps also: http://vixra.org/abs/1104.0002

Second breaking news:

Second experiment hints at seasonal dark matter signal

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20434-second-experiment-hints-at-seasonal-dark-matter-signal.html

If the dual Polar SABHs are located as indicated, and Black holes are also the creators of dark matter effects, THEN the seasonal dark matter signal is easily explained.

Pulsar B1509.

Pulsar B1509, a 1700 year old spinning neutron star with multiple mini black holes leaving to form starforming regions between Herbig Haro-binary black hole systems.

Starforming region NGC 604 (inside M33) with

two x-ray hotspots

as an example of two star forming anchor black holes or binary black holes.

These xray hotspots are NOT observed in optical Hubble images!

Our own Sun is assumed to be the remnant of such a system at a much smaller scale, leaving a simple planetary system with central star (Sun) behind.

latest news SEE:
Can the Sun's Siblings Be Found?
Science, 19-november 2010

Last year astronomer Simon Portegies Zwart of Leiden University in the Netherlands claimed that scientists might be able to find the sun's siblings

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/11/can-the-suns-siblings-be-found.html

NGC 604 is much larger and assumed to form a dwarf galaxy or globular cluster.

WHY black holes split and pair to form stars or galaxies

2008-09-11T02:25:00.001-07:00

Herbig Haro objects are in mainstream physics thought to be originated by stars in the making.

HOWEVER according to my new black hole paradigm, Herbig Haro objects are the origin of stars in the making and the origin of open star clusters, with TWO or even more small black holes at each end of the synchrotron jet, inside the so called "hotspot" at the end of the jets.
Even OUR SUN is supposed to be the remnant of such an open star cluster system with at least one black hole located at about one lightyear distance from each pole!
.
On a larger scale just after the big bang, Herbig Haro objects should have been active as the origin of galaxies and galaxy clusters.

The Carina nebula is a playground for splitting and pairing massless black holes.
Gas dust pillar regions like the Carina nebula, are well known cradles of stars. In addition we may say, cradles for fast multiplying mini black holes.
These newly formed black holes have a peculiar habit, they seem to pair in groups to form temporal visible Herbig Haro (HH) objects as the start of an open star cluster located in the centre of these paired hotspots.
However according to the images, there are multiple ways for these black holes to split and meet each other.

Herbig Haro hotspots seem to be only temporal visible manifestations at the end of the splitting and pairing black hole process.

Not only at this scale we can find such dumbbell structures but all over the cosmos, from HH objects to Galaxy clusters. See Coma cluster by Chandra image.
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2002/0150/index.html
Conclusion, we need a new scenario for black holes, because they seem to repel Fermions and leave gas channels behind as found in most nebula and other strange objects ( see below) around us.

Black holes seem to like splitting if the vacuum Higgs pressure (Casimir) around the NEW black hole nucleus decreases below a certain level (inside the Big Bang) or if the Vacuum pressure becomes anti-symmetrical due to the approach of other (smaller) black holes.

As a consequence the largest black holes we will mostly find at the edge (outer Halo) of non-merging Galaxies. (see below for the Andromeda galaxy in x-ray and optical)

Andromeda (M31) in x-ray showing multiple black hole hotspots

Optical Andromeda by Hubble telescope.

BALL LIGHTNING EXAMPLES

2008-09-11T02:18:00.001-07:00

SEE: WIKIPEDIA under BLACK HOLE HYPOTHESIS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning

FOR PRIMORDIAL MICRO BLACK HOLES, SEE:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_holes

Postscript

2008-09-11T00:16:00.000-07:00

ARE WE ABLE TO SEE THE WORLD (UNIVERSE) UPSIDE DOWN?

A quote by the famous physicist Max Planck:

"As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind.
This mind is the matrix of all matter."
I was just curious, was he referring literally to the idea that all matter has a conscious mind in one form or another? or was he just trying to be clever?

Is it actually possible for matter to be "intelligent"?

The new God particle and the second Law.

Hubble telescope images of the different forms of star formation and the shapes of so called “Gas pillars” inside the star forming nebulae of the Milky-way galaxy, tell us the story of New Physics with unexpected results for the future of mankind.
The story to be told in this book is based on numerous observations that potential Black holes -in contrast with mainstream physics- seem to repel all Fermions because they seem to repel all gas and dust particles! Gas and dust tails seem to push and accelerate these Black holes through the nebulae !
If this observation is right, then we are forced to assume, that the second Law of Thermo-dynamics is violated near "Black holes" and it will be a great job to find physical clues which support such a proposal.
The second law of thermodynamics states:
That in isolated systems, concentrated energy disperses over time, and consequently less concentrated energy is available to do useful work.
What we observe inside the nearby star forming nebulae is that there seems to be lots of energy available to do useful work and accelerate countless “entities” through these systems.

The violation of the second law.

If we are able to find a solution for such a violation, then this is a sign of new physics and at the same time a possibility to describe unexplained energized x-ray point sources, such as all Quasar Hotspots, Sunspots, Herbig Haro Hotspots, Comets, Sunspots, and even Ball Lightning.
If we look at the Carina Nebula, we may become a strong suspicion for acceleration phenomena, by recognizing pairing Black holes as the base for new Herbig Haro objects which are known as the origin of newly formed open star clusters.
However we need to find the mechanism behind these pairing Black holes which leads us to a new interpretation of physics.
After a long journey of research for this book, it came out that an extended model based on the non-relativistic “Bohm- Bell particle interpretation” of Quantum mechanics with additional real particle shapes, could do the job and explain most of the present anomalies in physics which are found on the macro and micro scale!
The Bohm-Bell interpretation is described in Bell’s book: “Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum mechanics” (Cambridge universal press, 1987) and recently discussed and supported in articles such as: “John Bell and Bell’s Theorem” (2004) by D. Dürr, S. Goldstein at all.
It was David Bohm and John Bell and others, like Jean Pierre Vigier and Basil Hiley, who tried to get an alternative picture and a more ontological sound proposal for physical reality.
They assumed that all particles should be real point-particles accompanied by a so called wave function but without a physical extension
However they failed to propose experimental differences with the standard theory to get a broad support from the physics community and the mathematical changes they proposed where not seen by the mainstream as a better alternative. This is described by Paul Davies and John Brown in “The Ghost in the Atom” described later in this book.
In contrast with the Bohm-Bell interpretation, we propose in this book, that the Higgs vacuum is a dense network or lattice occupied by fast oscillating FORM changing Higgs particles and that Fermions are not “point particles” but real spinning propeller shaped particles able to make a SPIN-FLIP at the Black hole horizon and repel from it.
Then we may have a logical foundation for violation of the second law of thermodynamics at the Black hole horizon. However, in that case, the vacuum is supposed to be a super dense God particle based particle system with a memory for speed and position of particles.
In this book I will explain and describe several useful experiments to create a experimental based foundation for such a real alternative.
That is to say, to understand those new experiments, we have to change our understanding of reality by descending down to the smallest microstructures such as the Electron and the Positron and we have to go up to the largest scale: the universe as a whole including the Big bang.
We will observe that the guiding system for particles we need just like David Bohm proposed (The Pilot wave) but did not find, should be about the same system as the guiding system for our free choices and free will.
This guiding system I dubbed: Multi-universal entanglement between anti-material universes located inside the raspberry shaped multiverse.
To name a few present anomalies at the macro- and micro-scale, which are explained in this book:
The Pioneer 10/11 anomaly.
The Fly-by anomaly.
The Venus-Mercury Radar reflection anomaly.
The GPS incidental outlier anomaly.

Free Will.

The brush of an artist is freely guided over the canvas while painting. We say the artist guides his brush in full freedom because he uses his free will to do so.
We also may say that historical events like wars or military interference are based on free will of the responsible presidents or responsible decision makers. But is this really the case? What we see, is the different morality of these two examples. In this book I will try to give an answer to the question of free will, based on rigorous causal reasoning and my new model of the world around us, which is made falsifiable and testable by a handful of future- but also by historical experiments already.

That new model is based on the unusual but most simple hypothesis for a new kind of Big Bang, together with the assumption, that our universe is STILL fully symmetric from the start in the form of a raspberry shaped multi universe, the "multiverse". The Big Bang should be interpreted as the Fractal evaporation of a Big Crunch Black hole, into an even set of symmetric and EPR related bubbles of copy universes.As a result, we live in a material bubble of the symmetric raspberry multiverse which is without time delay "entangled at a long distance" with the other (anti)-material copy bubbles. "EPR related" means that the particle system is based on the results of recent laboratory experiments originally based on the ideas of Einstein Podolski and Rosen (EPR). The EPR experiments demonstrated that particles that shared originally the same "identical state" remain instantly and enduringly connected, even at long distances like universal scales.
As a start I give here some thoughts of other thinkers about free will, also with a clear difference on morality impact.
The Arthur Schopenhauer idea about free will with a moral aspect:
I can do what I will: I can, if I will, give everything I have to the poor and thus become poor myself — if I will! But I cannot will this, because the opposing motives have much too much power over me for me to be able to. On the other hand, if I had a different character, even to the extent that I were a saint, then I would be able to will it. But then I could not keep from willing it, and hence I would have to do so.
The Rene Descartes idea: Cogito ergo sum: I think therefore I am.
To lift a tip of the solution described in this book, I would say beforehand, that the physics of the universe seem to have the possibility of moral aspects in itself. This hypothesis is in line with other thinkers like Teilhard de Chardin (Noösphere, global consciousness) and Frank Tipler, who both predicted that all historical and actual information about our world is stored somewhere in the vacuum around the Earth, however my physical underpinning is quite different. My own conviction about this subject is that the vacuum of the universe has a much more dense unresolved microscopic structure then mainstream physics wants to accept at this moment.
This vacuum structure is supposed to be able to store all our individual thoughts ideas and actions., like a digital ROM, a programmable read only memory, coined STP_ROM, (Solar Toroidal Programmable Read Only Memory). More in detail: It is as if the Earth as a whole makes backup copies of itself every split second and leave these copies behind in the form of a ring around the Sun.

Multiversal Consciousness, A shocking idea? the world upside down and doubled.

We humans seem to be able to tap information (backwards) out of this digital memory as a base for all our dreams and intuition.
More consequently, we are “forced” to constantly tap information out of this vacuum system, in the form of our dreams, creative intuition and even partly our human urges. Daniel Dennet described this effect as “Intuition pump”. Our social and moral behavior and habits are supposed to be influenced by this memory and as a consequence, the completion of this memory with its own Earth bound morality (good or bad) could be the ultimate goal of humanity as a local part of a much larger universal whole.
As a result, it is the base for our personal IDENTITY and perhaps even the origin for a scientific based astrology in the future, if the ring structure around the sun of this cosmic vacuum memory could be observed by scientific experiments.
I am very pleased about recent (2007) laboratory results found by Marcel Brass ( Gent) and Patrick Haggard (London) , which do confirm the well known work of Benjamin Libet on free will and his brain research on so called motor reaction times of subjects in the laboratory. These findings are also a strong refutation of the recent free will ideas of Daniel Dennett, who fiercely attacked Libet in his book “Freedom evolves” (2003).
It looks as if our free will can only be described as “not doing” or aborting at the last possible moment our intentions, in full agreement with Benjamin Libet's proposal for free will. The Zen Buddhist philosophy of the importance of “not doing” will be also of interest here.

Lee Smolin.

Einstein as a child, tried to imagine how the world would look like from the position of a Photon. If imagination is the motor of our changing interpretation of the world, then we should work on our imagination of the universe at all scales. Then the imaginative interpretation of the visual aspects of the Cosmos could be the base for real discrimination and order. If the collapse of the wavefunction is the only way for nature to make a choice then the explanation for human choices and FREE WILL should be related to wavefunction collapse.

One of the most recent and accessible descriptions of the great problems of physics, inspired me to write this book because I boldly think I can shed some modest alternative light. It is called “the Trouble with Physics” written by Lee Smolin, a well known physicist.

The five great problems in theoretical physics he describes are chosen to be the base for this book.. The possible alternatives that I invented for those problems seem just to fit in his descriptions. The five problems are described as follows:

1: Explain how all the particles and forces are manifestations of a single entity (the GOD particle) the unification of particles and forces. 2: How are the values chosen of the free constants in the standard model of particle physics. 3: Explain dark matter and Dark energy. 4: Combine general relativity and Quantum theory into a single theory that can claim to be the complete theory of nature, also called the Quantum Gravity problem. 5: Resolve the problems in the foundations of Quantum mechanics either by making sense of the standing theory or invent a new one.

To explain Free Will we also seem to need a new model of reality.
So I hope you will enjoy reading this book, but I must apologize for the crash you could experience about your own personal SELF. The world seems to be split in two -or even more- interconnected “entangled” mirror symmetrical parts and you are only partly responsible for your decisions you make.
However, as a consequence, You are not alone! We all are at a long distance direct related-in all our actions, dreams and thoughts- to our identical (anti-) counterparts at the other side of our universal bubble.
Is there consequently nothing left of a single personal identity, who has a single possibility to choose and could be the guiding entity for the others?
There is a small possibility yes, based on the existence of little deviations in the existing experiments made by Benjamin Libet and others. It is called "incidental pre-planning", which has got no scientific attention as far as I know.

In a private letter, Benjamin Libet wrote to me, that he was not able to reproduce the statistics of these incidental pre-planning events of his experiments, because they where "Buried" in his computer files.
As a weird but logic consequence, this Libet experiment should be reproduced to find out about the percentages of "incidental preplanning" to be able to peculate about the exact number of entangled mirror-copy universes.

Free Vacuum Energy.

Vacuum energy is supposed by mainstream physics to be energy exists in space even when devoid of matter. This vacuum energy is supposed to be the origin of all the fundamental forces, the electromagnetic- strong- weak- and Gravity forces.
It is found to be present in experiments like the spontaneous emission of light or gamma radiation, the , Van der Waals bonds, Casimir effect, the Lamb shift, etc; and in this book it is thought to have consequences for the behavior of the “symmetrical entangled” Universe on cosmological scales.
In this book I support the idea that the vacuum is able to produce this vacuum energy by the autonomous oscillation of densely tetrahedral shaped system (lattice) of Higgs particles. These Higgs particles are supposed to be the origin of all other particles (the God particle) by a simple change of their rigid FORM. Thus Fermions have also real rigid forms and are supposed to have a propeller shape to become spin by Higgs scattering coming in from all directions.
If the Higgs oscillations have a random globular impulse on a Fermion, we may conclude that the Fermion is in equilibrium with the Higgs vacuum in free space and if each impact is represented by one Higgs vector we may speak of a so symmetrical Higgs impulse vector Hedgehog (IVH).
If this vector Hedgehog is anti-symmetrical, the Fermion may have an absolute motion through the vacuum, (Lorentz polarization) or the Fermion is accelerated by a fundamental force like Gravity!
At the borders of a Black hole these Fermions seem to have an opposite reaction to the Higgs impact hedgehog. As a result Fermions are not able to enter the horizon of a Black hole.
As a consequence ENTROPY is decreasing around the horizon of a Black hole and the universe is served with Free Energy, or a "large scale Casimir effect" or "macro Casimir effect", the origin of quantum gravity and all non-Newtonian complexity in the universe like Cygnus A, the origin of so called Dark energy effects and perhaps in a downscaled form, even an alternative Free energy source on earth!
If the second Law of Thermodynamics doesn't hold for "Dark energy" or “Dark Matter”, then the description of unexplained energized x-ray point sources, such as Sunspots, Comets and Ball Lightning, should be one of the highest scientific goals, to generate a firm alternative for fossil fuel.
The Large Hadron Collider in Geneva which will start operation next year, is supposed to be able to produce small Ball Lightning scaled Black hole nuclei, as the base for new free energy production solutions. (See page 92, figure 2.8.5-2.8.6.)

For a quick search inside my new book:"The new God Particle and Free Will", at Amazon.com press:http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1409210316/ref=sib_dp_ptu#reader-linkor: http://www.lulu.com/content/2552961

Leo Vuyk.
Introduction to my book, may 2008.

Additional information: 9-april 2010.
Surprize: Quasars don't show redshift variation related to the accelerating expansion of the universe.
1: My FFF theoretical model predicts that quasars are black holes and as a consequence their light is gravitational redshifted by their own black hole graviitational field ( better vacuum distorion) instead of a distance related redshift!
2: Due to the poliferation of so many black holes located outside galaxies, redshift is in that sence related to distance by the continuous distortion of the photon trajectory to our telescopes.
Supernovae show this "time dilation" in the speed at which they fade - far-off explosions seem to dim more slowly than those nearby. But when Mike Hawkins of the Royal Observatory in Edinburgh, UK, looked at light from quasars he found no time dilation.
Time waits for no quasar – even though it should
Newscientist, 08 April 2010 by Marcus Chown
Magazine issue 2755.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627554.200-time-waits-for-no-quasar--even-though-it-should.html